- Sex
- Male
- Age
- 30
- Weight
- 80kg
- Height
- 180cm
- Formula
- Mifflin-St Jeor (recommended)
- Body fat percentage
- 20%
1,780kcal/d
Open with these values1,780kcal/d
Result: 1,780 kcal/dBasal metabolic rate is what your body burns in 24 hours doing nothing at all — no food, no movement. It is not what you should eat: multiply it by an activity factor first. Mifflin-St Jeor suits most people; pick Katch-McArdle only if your body fat percentage was properly measured.
1,780kcal/d
Open with these values1,345kcal/d
Open with these values1,666kcal/d
Open with these valuesBMR = 10·kg + 6.25·cm − 5·years + s (Mifflin-St Jeor)
Your basal metabolic rate is the energy your body spends doing nothing at all — breathing, circulating blood, repairing cells, holding its temperature — counted in kilocalories over twenty-four hours of complete rest. In someone with a desk job it accounts for roughly 60 to 75 percent of everything burned in a day. The calculator offers three published equations, and they are genuinely different equations rather than variants of one. Mifflin-St Jeor is the default and the best validated: a 2005 review in the Journal of the American Dietetic Association found it predicts resting energy expenditure within ten percent for about 82 percent of non-obese people, the best of the four common formulas. The revised Harris-Benedict equation, recalibrated by Roza and Shizgal in 1984, usually returns a slightly higher figure and is still asked for in clinical settings. Katch-McArdle takes a different route: it works from lean body mass and ignores sex entirely, which makes it the most accurate option — but only if you actually have a measured body fat percentage. The caveat that matters most is that this is not a calorie target. Your basal rate is the floor your body needs at rest, not a plan for what to eat. Eating at or below it is severe restriction, and the usual consequences are muscle loss, hormonal disruption and metabolic adaptation.
BMR is what the body spends at complete rest. Total daily energy expenditure adds activity on top of it and is a separate calculator.
It is the only one of the three that reads lean body mass, which makes it the most accurate — but only if that figure was measured rather than guessed.
The equations come from regression on groups of people. An individual metabolic rate can sit well above or below the number for reasons no formula can see.
Mifflin-St Jeor and Harris-Benedict should agree.
They are different equations with different constants, fitted to different data. A gap of a hundred calories between them is ordinary.
Eating my BMR is a safe daily target.
BMR excludes everything you do while awake. It is a floor for the arithmetic, not a target for the plate.
| Equation | Reads | Man, 80 kg, 180 cm, 30 y | Woman, same body |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) | weight, height, age, sex | 1780 kcal | 1614 kcal |
| Harris-Benedict (1984 revision) | weight, height, age, sex | 1854 kcal | 1615 kcal |
| Katch-McArdle (at 20 % body fat) | weight, body fat | 1752 kcal | 1752 kcal |
It is the kilocalories your body burns in 24 hours completely at rest — no digestion, no movement. For most people that is 60–75 % of the whole day's burn, which makes it the baseline every calorie target is built on.
For most healthy adults Mifflin-St Jeor. A 2005 meta-analysis found it lands within 10 % for about 82 % of healthy non-obese people, against roughly 68 % for Harris-Benedict. Harris-Benedict dates to 1919, revised in 1984, and tends to read slightly high.
It reads lean body mass instead of total weight and sex, which helps if you carry unusual amounts of muscle or fat. That only holds when the body fat percentage was measured properly — a rough number from a bathroom scale carries its error straight into the result.
Muscle loss, a long history of calorie restriction, thyroid problems and age all push it down; it falls roughly 1–2 % per decade after 20. The equation is a population average, and 10–15 % either side of it is normal.
No. BMR is what a body burns lying still all day, so eating at that level is a severe restriction for anyone who moves. Multiply it by an activity factor between 1.2 and 1.9 first — that number is the one to eat at.
All three are statistical predictions, not measurements, and they cannot tell muscle from fat when they read total weight. Accuracy drops in severe obesity, eating disorders, metabolic disease and extreme training. The reference method is indirect calorimetry by a clinician.
Information, not medical advice.
Diese Seite gibt es auch auf Deutsch.
Zu Deutsch wechseln