- Sex
- Male
- Height
- 178cm
- Formula
- Devine
73.2kg
Open with these values73.2kg
Result: 73.2 kgIdeal body weight formulas were written for drug dosing, not for setting a personal target. They give a single number from height and sex alone, so they ignore build, muscle and body composition entirely.
Held fixed: Sex Male, Formula Devine.
| Height (cm) | Result (kg) |
|---|---|
| 150.0 | 47.8 |
| 160.0 | 56.9 |
| 170.0 | 65.9 |
| 178.0Your value | 73.2 |
| 180.0 | 75.0 |
| 190.0 | 84.0 |
| 200.0 | 93.1 |
| 210.0 | 102.2 |
73.2kg
Open with these values56.9kg
Open with these values88.0kg
Open with these valuesDevine ♂: 50 kg + 2.3 kg × (inches over 152.4 cm)
Ideal body weight is a single number derived from height and sex, and its origin explains nearly everything about it: the four equations here were written for clinical drug dosing, where a standardised weight is needed to size a dose. All four share one shape — a base weight at five feet, 152.4 cm, plus a fixed amount for every further inch — which is why an imperial step turns up in the middle of a metric field. For a man of 178 cm, Devine takes its base of 50 kg and adds 2.3 kg for each of the 10.08 inches above 152.4 cm, arriving at 73.2 kg. Robinson, Miller and Hamwi work identically with other constants and return 71.1, 70.4 and 75.2 kg for the same man. Read the spread rather than the single figure. Nearly five kilos separate the four answers to one height, and none of them is more correct than the rest: they are four fits to four populations, not competing measurements of something real. Devine is preselected only because it is the one most often used in dosing. The limitation that matters most is what the equations are allowed to know. Height and sex go in; nothing else does. Build, muscle and body composition are absent from the arithmetic, so a muscular person reads low against all four. It is a dosing estimate, not a weight to aim at.
These formulas were written for clinical drug dosing, not for setting a weight to aim at. They take height and sex and nothing else.
At 178 cm the four equations give a man 70.4, 71.1, 73.2 and 75.2 kg. That spread of nearly five kilos is the honest answer.
Each one is a base weight at 152.4 cm plus a fixed amount for every further inch. The imperial step inside a metric field is a leftover from their origin in dosing.
The height field starts at 120 cm, but the formulas were fitted on adults. Paediatric dosing uses different methods entirely.
Devine says 73.2 kg, so that is the weight I should be.
It is a dosing estimate, not a health target. It knows nothing about build, muscle or body composition.
I weigh more than the result, so I am carrying too much.
The formulas take only height and sex, so a muscular person reads low against them. The number cannot tell a heavy athlete from a heavy sedentary person.
One of the four formulas has to be the correct one.
None is more correct than the others; they are different fits, not competing measurements. Devine is simply the one most often used in dosing.
It is a single number derived from height and sex, written for clinical dosing rather than for personal targets. It knows nothing about build, muscle or body composition.
Each was fitted to a different population with a different starting weight and a different slope per inch. At 178 cm for a man they give 70.4, 71.1, 73.2 and 75.2 kg — a spread of nearly five kilos from the same height.
None of them is more correct than the others; they are different fits, not competing measurements. Devine is the one most often used in dosing, which is why it is the default here.
The result will read low, because the formulas take only height and sex as input. A number that ignores muscle cannot tell a heavy athlete from a heavy sedentary person.
No. The height range starts at 120 cm, but the formulas were fitted on adults and paediatric dosing uses different methods entirely.
Information, not medical advice.
Diese Seite gibt es auch auf Deutsch.
Zu Deutsch wechseln